International Gems News CIBJO Moves to Scrap Laboratory Grown Term from Diamond Guidelines by James Josh September 12, 2025 written by James Josh September 12, 2025 Share 0FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail 228 Key points This Gems News report comes at a time when global diamond demand has slowed, production has decreased, and natural diamond prices have taken a hit. The introduction of lab-grown diamonds was one of the worse occurrences in the history and the gems and jewelry industryImage Credit. For the latest on the garbage lab-grown diamonds that should really be labelled simply as fake diamonds, keep on logging to Gems News. Gems News: Industry Body Revisits Controversial 2010 Decision The World Jewellery Confederation (CIBJO) has announced its intention to reconsider its 2010 resolution that permitted the use of “laboratory-grown” and “laboratory-created” as acceptable substitutes for the word “synthetic.” According to industry leaders, the terms are misleading, blur the boundaries between natural and manufactured diamonds, and could negatively affect sales of mined stones. The subject will be formally discussed at CIBJO’s 2025 Congress, scheduled for October 27 to 29 in Paris. This Gems News report comes at a time when global diamond demand has slowed, production has decreased, and natural diamond prices have taken a hit. CIBJO plans to drop the term “laboratory grown” from official diamond guidelines at its 2025 Congress in Paris.Image Credit: StockShots Calls For Clearer Boundaries Udi Sheintal, president of CIBJO’s Diamond Commission, emphasized that the industry is currently at a crossroads. He noted that restoring consumer confidence depends on drawing a sharper line between natural and synthetic diamonds. “Our trade is going through major transformation,” Sheintal said. “Consumers need transparency and integrity. Reestablishing clearer definitions is essential for the long-term survival of the natural diamond sector.” CIBJO’s earlier resolution was adopted at its 2010 Congress in Munich, Germany, allowing more consumer-friendly terms for synthetics. However, with new market pressures, many within the industry argue that the decision has created confusion rather than clarity. Debate Over Grading Systems Beyond terminology, CIBJO also intends to address whether the 4Cs grading system should apply exclusively to natural diamonds. The Gemological Institute of America (GIA) recently announced it would stop grading lab-grown diamonds using the same criteria. In contrast, the International Gemological Institute (IGI) has doubled down on its policy of grading both natural and lab-grown stones alike. This divergence has raised industry tensions, with critics saying that treating synthetics like mined diamonds diminishes the value of natural gems. The introduction of lab-grown diamonds was one of the worse occurrences in the history and the gems and jewelry industryImage Credit: StockShots Push For Greater Transparency A central part of the new proposal involves enhancing consumer transparency. Sheintal stressed that synthetic diamonds are not grown or created in laboratories but rather manufactured in large industrial facilities through artificial processes. CIBJO believes marketing must reflect this reality to prevent consumer misconceptions. “It is timely and necessary that we reflect on our past decisions,” Sheintal said. “We must recognize where mistakes were made and move toward a more transparent and responsible future.” The push to change terminology is expected to stir significant debate at the Paris Congress, with both supporters and opponents voicing strong opinions. Industry Impact and Future Outlook If approved, the move to eliminate “laboratory-grown” from official terminology could have wide-reaching implications for manufacturers, retailers, and certification bodies. Proponents believe it will safeguard the prestige of natural diamonds and help stabilize prices, while critics argue it may alienate younger consumers more open to lab-created gems. Either way, the upcoming discussions are likely to be closely watched, as the outcome could redefine global diamond marketing for the next decade. The initiative highlights the growing urgency within the diamond sector to protect natural stones from market dilution while adapting to shifting consumer behaviors. With major players divided, the results of CIBJO’s deliberations in Paris may set the tone for future regulations, marketing strategies, and trade ethics. The decisions made could influence how consumers perceive the value and authenticity of diamonds worldwide for many years to come. For the latest on the garbage lab-grown diamonds that should really be labelled simply as fake diamonds, keep on logging to Gems News. You Might Also Like Gold Rally Surges in 2025 But Turbulent H2 Could Derail Gains Christies Paris Auction Breaks Records as Rare Gems Ignite Frenzy Beauty Products and Jewelry Unite in Dazzling Collaborations Jewelry Market Set to Soar to 343 Billion Dollars by 2032 CIBJO diamond guidelinesdiamond consumer confidencediamond industry nomenclaturefuture of lab-grown diamondsjewelry industry standardslab-grown vs synthetic diamonds Share 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail James Josh James Josh is a New York-based writer who divides his time between the United States and Asia. He covers a wide range of business topics for various publications across both regions previous post Dubai Overtakes Antwerp as the New Diamond Capital next post Dubai Jewellery Standards Build Global Trust You may also like Ethiopia Emerges as New Paraíba Tourmaline Source June 22, 2026 Alrosa’s 2030 Natural Diamond Push Sparks Global Attention June 14, 2026 Diamond Alliance Sparks New Global Push June 2, 2026 Inside The Hidden Billion-Dollar Gem Market June 1, 2026 GCAL 8X Cushion Grade Sparks Diamond Buzz May 28, 2026 Fancy Color Diamond Prices Slip Amid Selective Demand May 13, 2026